TSA Pedophile Caught Red Handed Uploading Child Porn

This is why we don't want a TSA screener touching us or our children. Some are bunch of pedophiles. As noted in past blogs, TSA hires pedophiles and criminals. What a great job for them. They get paid to feel and steal. It's the best of both world for these derelicts.

(Philly) A passenger screener at Philadelphia International Airport is facing charges that he distributed more than 100 images of child pornography via Facebook, records show.

Federal agents also allege that Transportation Safety Administration Officer Thomas Gordon Jr. of Philadelphia, who routinely searched airline passengers, uploaded explicit pictures of young girls to an Internet site on which he also posted a photograph of himself in his TSA uniform.

Homeland Security agents arrested the TSA officer March 24, and he is being held without bail.

Although the case was unsealed Thursday, neither the indictment nor the news release mentioned Gordon's job searching airline passengers for TSA.

The arrest comes as TSA grapples with several other incidents involving screeners, including a YouTube video posted last week by parents angry about the pat-down their 6-year-old daughter received at an airport in New Orleans. TSA officials said the pat-down was proper; the parents said the girl was "groped."

TSA security looks at people who complain about TSA security

It doesn't matter if TSA has implemented a program to screen passengers. It is the idea that they can pull someone from the line and interrogate them because they complain against TSA. It is an abuse of power. It is bad enough that TSA screeners have a chip on their shoulder. Travelers don't need a power hungry goon going through an ego trip.

(CNN) Washington-- Don't like the way airport screeners are doing their job? You might not want to complain too much while standing in line.

Arrogant complaining about airport security is one indicator Transportation Security Administration officers consider when looking for possible criminals and terrorists, CNN has learned exclusively. And, when combined with other behavioral indicators, it could result in a traveler facing additional scrutiny.

CNN has obtained a list of roughly 70 "behavioral indicators" that TSA behavior detection officers use to identify potentially "high risk" passengers at the nation's airports.

Many of the indicators, as characterized in open government reports, are behaviors and appearances that may be indicative of stress, fear or deception. None of them, as the TSA has long said, refer to or suggest race, religion or ethnicity.

But one addresses passengers' attitudes towards security, and how they express those attitudes.

It reads: "Very arrogant and expresses contempt against airport passenger procedures."

TSA officials declined to comment on the list of indicators, but said that no single indicator, taken by itself, is ever used to identify travelers as potentially high-risk passengers. Travelers must exhibit several indicators before behavior detection officers steer them to more thorough screening.

Instrusive Pat Down on Children is NO Difference to Pedophilia

This child will never be the same again. Instrusive pat-downs on children is no difference to pedophilia. The scar from this experience will further damage the development of the child and the way she interacts socially. It doesn't matter pat-downs to children is procedural and necessary. There are other ways to screen a child without going through an invasive pat down. Touching a child is just plain wrong.

(ABCNEWS) The family of the 6-year-old girl who received a pat down at airport security in New Orleans said today there needs to be a different screening process for children.

"We struggle to teach our kids to protect themselves, to say 'no, it's not ok to touch me in this way in this area," the girl's mother, Selena Drexel, said. "Yet here we are saying it's ok for these people." If we don't find other ways we're making them more vulnerable, she said.

Drexel and her husband, Dr. Todd Drexel, of Bowling Green, Ky., appeared this morning in an exclusive interview with "Good Morning America."

A video of the couple's daughter going through the screening went viral on the Internet, getting thousands of views on sites like YouTube. It shows a TSA agent rubbing the young girl's inner thighs and running her fingers inside the top of the girl's blue jeans.

The Drexels said they stood powerless, watching as their daughter was patted down.

"I did ask for alternatives, I asked for her to be rescanned," Selena Drexel said. "They just refused and said they were going to do what they were going to do."

Selena Drexel said she could only speculate as to why the 6-year-old was selected for the pat down. She said that the TSA supervisor made it clear "non-verbally" that there would be trouble if she caused a fuss.

The girl's father said that while his daughter was polite and respectful during the screening, she broke down into tears afterwards.

Airline Passenger Found Not Guilty of All Charges From TSA Arrest

Finally, we have a case marking the first time anyone has ever challenged TSA's authority to question and detain a traveler. The final result ended giving airline passengers the upper hand over TSA. It is apparent that these TSA workers have "chip on their shoulders," and are egotistical. It is a power trip using intimidation to unsuspected travelers. The reality is not base on exaggeration. The reality is base on experience.

(Seattle Weekly) After an hour of deliberation Friday evening, a Bernalillo County, New Mexico jury found Phil Mocek not guilty of all four charges he faced after refusing to show his ID and using a video recorder at a TSA checkpoint in 2009. If you're keeping score at home, that's Mocek: 1, TSA: 0.

According to Edward Hasbrouck of the Identity Project, Mocek did not testify, and the defense rested on Friday without calling any witnesses or presenting any evidence. Hasbrouck attended the trial; he writes:

The jury found that even without rebuttal, the TSA and Albuquerque police had failed to satisfy their burden of proving any of the four charges: concealing his identity, refusing to obey a lawful order (it was never entirely clear whether this was supposed to have been an order to turn off his camera, an order to leave the airport despite having a valid ticket, or an order to show ID, none of which would have been lawful orders), trespassing, and disorderly conduct.

Hillary Clinton Wont Go Through Any Pat Down nor Should You

(Fox News)Hillary Clinton made this comments in an interview today on CBS' "Face the Nation" and NBC's "Meet the Press."

Hillary Clinton was asked if she would accept a pat down by TSA. She said,

"Not if I could avoid it. No! I mean, who would?"

It seems hypocritical that Obama and the Secretary of State are not obligate to go through a body scanner or pat down. It seems the enemy is the citizens of the United States. Why should we be inconvenience when the people who should get a pat down is Washington.

I Will Let TSA Fondle My Junk If They Do The Same to Obama and His Family

A great opinion editorial from the Washington Examiner by a columnist whose family was recently fondled by TSA agents. Mark Hemingway said, "Since the TSA molested my family, why doesn’t Obama volunteer to subject his family to the same security procedures?"

Let's go one step further. Give the same treatment to Janet Napolitano, the US Senate and the US House of Representatives. Have each of them endure the humiliation and grief the American people have to go through. It only seems fair.

Read story: Since the TSA molested my family, why doesn’t Obama volunteer to subject his family to the same security procedures?

TSA Will Put Their Hand Down Your Pants

(Prison Planet.com) The TSA’s invasive new screening measures include officers literally putting their hands down people’s pants if they are wearing baggy clothing in a shocking new elevation of groping procedures that have stoked a nationwide revolt against privacy-busting airport security measures.

The level of abuse appears to be getting worse on an almost daily basis. First TSA agents use the back of their hands, then they outright grope you with the front, and now they are being trained to put their hands down traveler’s pants. What’s next? Mandatory bodily probes?

Even as the resistance to airport oppression grows, Big Sis and the TSA are responding by making the pat down procedures more invasive. Napolitano has figuratively said to the American people ‘let them eat cake’ as she slaps them in the face.

If this is not an obvious violation of privacy rights, I don't know what is. If a TSA put their hand down your pants and feel your "junk", you have the right of slugging them square on the mouth. Just say the TSA employee squeeze your testicles or they rubbed the clitoris. I can see trial lawyers salivating over potential law suits against TSA.